ReviewPharmaceutics2025
The Role of Nanoparticle Elasticity on Biological Hydrogel Penetration.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polydopamine Nanoparticles as Label-Free Contrast Agents in Photoacoustic ImagingACS applied optical materials · 2026Article
- Mucopenetrative Lipid-Polymer nanoparticles show Potent Anti-Inflammatory activity in a human Lung-on-Chip model.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The latest advancements in nanomedicine have led to increased therapeutic efficacy and reduced complications. However, nanoparticle penetration is significantly influenced by biological hydrogels, such as mucus, the extracellular matrix, biofilms, and nucleoporins. Solely modifying well-studied physicochemical properties like size, charge, and surface chemistry is insufficient to fully elucidate or overcome these barriers. Recent studies have investigated the impact of particle elasticity, a relatively unexplored yet crucial physicochemical property influencing many biological processes. Hence, it is important to explore the impact of particle elasticity on penetrating biological hydrogels. This review examines biological hydrogels' structural and functional features as diffusion barriers, provides an overview of particle elasticity, key elasticity measurement techniques, and explores strategies for elasticity modulation in nanoparticles, such as composition, crosslinking density, and structural design. Furthermore, nanoparticle penetration mechanisms, influenced by particle deformability, hydrogel mesh size, and adhesive interactions, are investigated by integrating theoretical and experimental findings. The evaluation of experimental data reveals the commonly observed particle elasticity trends in mucus penetration, extracellular matrix permeation, and corneal penetration of nanoparticles. Overall, this review offers valuable insights into designing next-generation nanomedicines capable of overcoming biological barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.