ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Natural Products for Improving Soft Tissue Healing: Mechanisms, Innovations, and Clinical Potential.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Formulation Attributes and Preclinical Wound Healing Outcomes of Natural Product Based Nanoemulsions: A Systematic Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of Topically Administered Natural Compounds on Cesarean Section Healing-A Retrospective Observational Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hyaluronic Acid-Based Biomaterials for Soft Tissue Repair and Wound Healing: Clinical Evidence and Emerging Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Therapeutic strategies to enhance proliferation in diabetic wound contraction: a comprehensive review from 1991-2025.Acta diabetologica · 2026Review
- Bioactive-Enriched Chitosan/Poly(vinyl Alcohol) Electrospun Nanofibers for Wound Healing: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Botanical and Upcycled Bioactives for Advanced Topical Formulations: Mechanistic Pathways, Cutaneous Delivery, and Sustainability-by-Design.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Quercetin in skin burn healing: mechanisms, advanced delivery systems, and translational perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Mucoadhesive chitosan-coated boswellic acids nanoparticles as promising gastroprotective nanoagents via modulation of the RAS/ERK signaling pathway.Discover nano · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Chemistry and Bioactivity of Bee Products and Their Derivatives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From Sea to Therapy: Marine Biomaterials for Drug Delivery and Wound Healing.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scar development is a notable clinical and aesthetic issue in soft tissue healing, frequently compromising functionality and quality of life. Conventional treatments demonstrate limited efficacy in avoiding fibrosis and facilitating regenerative repair. Nevertheless, natural compounds have surfaced as viable alternatives owing to their biocompatibility, multitarget bioactivity, and historical application in traditional medicine. This review examines the therapeutic potential of plant-derived substances, marine agents, and microbial metabolites in influencing critical stages of wound healing, including inflammation, oxidative stress, fibroblast activation, and extracellular matrix remodeling. While these agents have demonstrated beneficial effects in preclinical models, their direct impact on functional or aesthetic clinical outcomes remains under investigation. We propose a hierarchical framework linking molecular mechanisms to clinical endpoints, suggesting that improvements at the cellular and molecular level may eventually support better healing quality. Natural bioactives, especially when integrated into advanced delivery systems such as hydrogels and nanocarriers, show promise for enhancing the regenerative microenvironment. By contextualizing these mechanisms within real-world therapeutic goals, this review highlights both the potential and limitations of natural products in the pursuit of improved soft tissue healing. Further translational research is needed to determine how modulation of these processes may reduce scarring and approach clinically meaningful outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.