ReviewPharmaceutics2025
A Review on New Frontiers in Drug-Drug Interaction Predictions and Safety Evaluations with In Vitro Cellular Models.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The characterization of a drug's ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) profile is crucial for accurately determining its safety and efficacy. The rising prevalence of polypharmacy has significantly increased the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). These interactions can lead to altered drug exposure, potentially compromising efficacy or increasing the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), thereby posing significant clinical and regulatory concerns. Traditional methods for assessing potential DDIs rely heavily on in vitro models, including enzymatic assays and transporter studies. While indispensable, these approaches have inherent limitations in scalability, cost, and ability to predict complex interactions. Recent advancements in analytical technologies, particularly the development of more sophisticated cellular models and computational modeling, have paved the way for more accurate and efficient DDI assessments. Emerging methodologies, such as organoids, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, and artificial intelligence (AI), demonstrate significant potential in this field. A powerful and increasingly adopted approach is the integration of in vitro data with in silico modeling, which can lead to better in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). This review provides a comprehensive overview of both conventional and novel strategies for DDI predictions, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Equipping researchers with a structured framework for selecting optimal methodologies improves safety and efficacy evaluation and regulatory decision-making and deepens the understanding of DDIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.