Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574059›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

A Review on New Frontiers in Drug-Drug Interaction Predictions and Safety Evaluations with In Vitro Cellular Models.

Lara Marques, Nuno Vale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lara MarquesPerMed Research Group, RISE-Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7003-4957
Nuno ValePerMed Research Group, RISE-Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1283-1042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characterization of a drug's ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) profile is crucial for accurately determining its safety and efficacy. The rising prevalence of polypharmacy has significantly increased the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). These interactions can lead to altered drug exposure, potentially compromising efficacy or increasing the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), thereby posing significant clinical and regulatory concerns. Traditional methods for assessing potential DDIs rely heavily on in vitro models, including enzymatic assays and transporter studies. While indispensable, these approaches have inherent limitations in scalability, cost, and ability to predict complex interactions. Recent advancements in analytical technologies, particularly the development of more sophisticated cellular models and computational modeling, have paved the way for more accurate and efficient DDI assessments. Emerging methodologies, such as organoids, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, and artificial intelligence (AI), demonstrate significant potential in this field. A powerful and increasingly adopted approach is the integration of in vitro data with in silico modeling, which can lead to better in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). This review provides a comprehensive overview of both conventional and novel strategies for DDI predictions, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Equipping researchers with a structured framework for selecting optimal methodologies improves safety and efficacy evaluation and regulatory decision-making and deepens the understanding of DDIs.

Indexed as

cell culturescomputational modelingcytochrome P450drug-drug interactiondrug metabolismin vitro to in vivo extrapolationphysiologically based pharmacokinetic model

Identifiers

PMID40574059
PMCPMC12195914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.