ArticleVaccines2025
Immunization with Inactivated
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting dengue through mucosal vaccination: the potential of NS1 and bacterial spore-based delivery platforms.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Recombinant Bacillus subtilis spores expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induced humoral, mucosal, and cellular immunity in mice.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Chemical Inactivation ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Review
- Endospore-formingFrontiers in oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe emergence of multidrug-resistant
methodsRecombinant spores were inactivated using iron-ethanol sporicidal solution and administered to BALB/c mice (8-12 weeks old) to assess safety and immunogenicity. Toxicity was evaluated through clinical monitoring, serum biochemistry, and histopathology. Immune responses were characterized by T/B cell activation, IgG/IgA titers, and mucosal sIgA levels. Protective efficacy was determined by challenging immunized mice with MDR
resultsThe inactivated spores exhibited an excellent safety profile, with no adverse effects on clinical parameters, organ function, or tissue integrity. Immunization induced robust systemic and mucosal immunity, evidenced by elevated CD4+/CD8+ T cells, B cells, and antigen-specific IgG/IgA in serum and mucosal secretions. Following the challenge, vaccinated mice showed significantly reduced pulmonary bacterial burdens (>90% reduction), and preserved lung and spleen architecture compared to controls, which developed severe inflammation and tissue damage.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that inactivated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.