ArticleVaccines2025
FcRn-Driven Nanoengineered Mucosal Vaccine with Multi-Epitope Fusion Induces Robust Dual Immunity and Long-Term Protection Against
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mucosal immunity and vaccine development.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Dual-targeting oral nanoparticle mucosal vaccine against brucella infection: co-targeting M cells and dendritic cells.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Reverse vaccinology-driven construction and bioinformatics validation of a multi-epitope vaccine against Brucella spp.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrucellosis poses a significant public health challenge, necessitating effective vaccine development. Current vaccines have limitations such as safety concerns and inadequate mucosal immunity. This study aims to develop an FcRn-targeted mucosal
methodsThe study developed a recombinant antigen (h-tFc-MEV) through computational analyses to validate antigenicity, structural stability, solubility, and allergenic potential. Molecular simulations confirmed FcRn binding. The vaccine was delivered orally via chitosan nanoparticles in murine models. Immunization was compared to MEV-only immunization. Post-challenge assessments were conducted to evaluate protection against
resultsComputational analyses showed that the antigen had favorable properties without allergenic potential. Molecular simulations demonstrated robust FcRn binding. In murine models, oral delivery elicited enhanced systemic immunity with elevated serum IgG titers and amplified CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratios compared to MEV-only immunization. Mucosal immunity was evidenced by significant IgA upregulation across multiple tracts. Long-term immune memory persisted for six months. Post-challenge assessments revealed markedly reduced
conclusionsThe FcRn-targeted strategy establishes concurrent mucosal and systemic protective immunity against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.