ArticleVaccines2025
Real-World Effectiveness of Boosting Against Omicron Hospitalization in Older Adults, Stratified by Frailty.
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesOlder adults with frailty are at-risk of worse outcomes following respiratory-viral-infections such as COVID-19. Data on effectiveness of vaccination/boosting in frail older adults during Omicron is lacking.
methodsNational healthcare-claims data and COVID-19 registries were utilized to enroll a cohort of older Singaporeans (≥60 years) as of 1 January 2022, divided into low/intermediate/high-risk for frailty; matching weights were utilized to adjust for sociodemographic differences/vaccination uptake at enrolment across frailty categories. Competing-risk-regression (Fine-Gray) taking death as a competing risk, with matching weights applied, was utilized to compare risks of COVID-19-related hospitalizations and severe COVID-19 across frailty levels (low/intermediate/high-risk), with estimates stratified by booster status. Individuals were followed up until study end-date (20 December 2023).
results874,160 older adults were included during Omicron-predominant transmission; ~10% had intermediate/high-frailty-risk. Risk of hospitalization/severe COVID-19 was elevated in those with intermediate/high-frailty-risk up to XBB/JN.1 transmission. Boosting was associated with decreased risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization across all frailty categories in infection-naïve individuals. However, in infection-naïve older adults with high-frailty-risk, while receipt of first boosters was associated with lower risk of COVID-19-hospitalization/severe COVID-19, additional booster doses did not reduce risk. In reinfected older adults, first boosters were still associated with lower hospitalization risk (adjusted-hazards-ratio, aHR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.33-0.92) among the non-frail, but not in the intermediate/high-frailty-risk minority.
conclusionsFirst boosters were associated with reduced adverse COVID-19 outcomes across all frailty categories in infection-naïve older adults during Omicron. However, in the high-frailty minority, boosting did not additionally reduce risk in reinfected individuals with hybrid immunity, and beyond the first booster for infection-naïve individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.