ArticleVaccines2025
Safety and Immunogenicity of a Modified Self-Amplifying Ribonucleic Acid (saRNA) Vaccine Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein in SARS-CoV-2 Seronegative and Seropositive Ugandan Individuals.
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04934111 (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of LNP-nCOV saRNA-02, a Self-amplifying Ribonucleic Acid), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of LNP-nCOV saRNA-02, a Self-amplifying Ribonucleic Acid (saRNA) Vaccine, in SARS-CoV-2 Seronegative and Seropositive Uganda Population
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) and circular RNA (circRNA) vaccines: Progress, evidence gaps, and translational pathways for durable and scalable immunization.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Pulmonary Delivery of Self-Amplifying RNA: Balancing Inflammation and Durable Transgene Expression.ACS nano · 2026Article
- RNA Therapeutics in Viral Infections and Cancer: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Prospects: A Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Article
- The Interplay Between Therapeutic Self-Amplifying RNA and the Innate Immune System: Balancing Efficiency and Reactogenicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Potential of Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated Spread of Self-Amplifying RNA and a Way to Mitigate It.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for innovative vaccine platforms that elicit durable immunity. Self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccines offer rapid production and dose-sparing advantages over traditional mRNA platforms. In Uganda's first SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trial (NCT04934111), we assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a saRNA vaccine encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) glycoprotein in seronegative and seropositive adults.
methodsThis non-randomised phase 1 trial (December 2021-April 2022) enrolled 42 healthy adults (18-45 years), including 12 seronegative and 30 seropositive for SARS-CoV-2. Participants received two 5 μg doses of saRNA vaccine, four weeks apart. Reactogenicity was assessed using diary cards for seven days post-vaccination, and adverse events were monitored throughout the 24-week study. Binding and neutralising antibody levels were quantified using ELISA and pseudovirus neutralisation assays.
findingsThe vaccine was well tolerated, with only mild-to-moderate adverse events, including fatigue, headache, and chills. No serious vaccine-related events occurred. Among seronegative participants, 91.6% seroconverted after two doses (median S-IgG: 3695 ng/mL,
conclusionThe saRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was safe and immunogenic, inducing robust spike glycoprotein-specific antibody responses, particularly in seronegative participants. This trial demonstrates the potential of saRNA vaccines for broader use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.