Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Francisco José Domingues NetoSao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3885-1244
Marco Antonio TecchioSao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural Sciences, Botucatu 18618-689, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7868-2265
Silvia Regina CunhaSao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural Sciences, Botucatu 18618-689, SP, Brazil.
Harleson Sidney Almeida MonteiroSao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural Sciences, Botucatu 18618-689, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6141-4248
Ricardo FigueiraSao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural Sciences, Botucatu 18618-689, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0312-1401
Aline NunesSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Biosciences, Botucatu 18618-689, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7758-2681
João Domingos RodriguesSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Biosciences, Botucatu 18618-689, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4947-0997
Elizabeth Orika OnoSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Biosciences, Botucatu 18618-689, SP, Brazil.
Mara Fernandes Moura-FurlanAgronomic Institute of Campinas (IAC), Jundiaí 13214-820, SP, Brazil.
Giuseppina Pace Pereira LimaSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Biosciences, Botucatu 18618-689, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1792-2605
Funding
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the Research Productivity Scholarship 305724/2018-5, 311719/2023-6, 304258/2024-5, 303923/2018-0, and 307377/2021-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP-Research Support Foundation of the State of São Paulo) 2016/07510-2, 2015/16440-5, 2020/12152-3, 2011/03440-6, 2013/08915-5, and 2015/16440-5
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Grapes are rich in bioactive compounds, including phenolics and anthocyanins, which exhibit antioxidant properties and offer potential health benefits. The accumulation of these compounds is influenced by agronomic practices, particularly rootstock selection and training systems. This study evaluated the effects of different rootstocks ('IAC 766 Campinas' and '106-8 Mgt') and training systems (low and high vertical shoot positioning) on the polyphenolic composition and antioxidant activity in the skins and pulps of
Indexed as
antioxidant capacityphenolic compoundsvertical shoot position
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Impact of Rootstocks and Training Systems on Secondary Metabolites in the Skins and Pulp of · full record | OpenQuestion