Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40573731›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Plant Growth, Yield, and Quality of Bush Tea (

Vhuhwavho Tshilidzi Ndou, Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, Mangaliso Goge, Tshephiso Papo, Mzamo Shozi, Maanea Lonia Ramphinwa, Fhatuwani Nixwell Mudau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vhuhwavho Tshilidzi NdouSchool of Agricultural, Environmental Sciences and Earth Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa.ORCID 0009-0009-2789-532X
Tafadzwanashe MabhaudhiSchool of Agricultural, Environmental Sciences and Earth Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9323-8127
Mangaliso GogeSchool of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4056-4620
Tshephiso PapoSchool of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7860-1442
Mzamo ShoziSchool of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban 4000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7666-2543
Maanea Lonia RamphinwaDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Faculty of Sciences, Agriculture and Engineering, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1968-9672
Fhatuwani Nixwell MudauSchool of Agricultural, Environmental Sciences and Earth Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3623-6421

Funding

Water Research Commission This research was funded by Water Research Commission (WRC) project (C2020/2021 00420) on "Water Utilization and Nutritional Utilization of Bush Tea"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native to South Africa, Bush tea is a plant that thrives in various climates. Cultural practices such as mineral nutrition, fertigation, pruning, and harvesting have been shown to influence bush tea's quality, growth, and yield. This study set out to determine the effects of mulching and deficit irrigation on the growth, yield, and quality of bush tea. Three deficit irrigation treatments (0%, 30%, and 100% Crop evapotranspiration (ETc) on field capacity) and three mulch treatments (sawdust, black plastic mulch, and no mulch) were included in a two-factor experiment, which was set up in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Physiological and growth parameters were taken every two weeks. The number of branches was counted, and measurements of chlorophyll content and the proportion of radiation intercepted by the canopy were recorded. Yield and secondary metabolites such as sugar residuals, fatty acids, and phenols of bush tea were determined after harvest. Growing bush tea under various water regimes showed that a 30% water regime significantly enhanced plant growth characteristics, including the proportion of intercepted radiation, plant height, and both fresh and dry weight. Furthermore, under different water regimes, sawdust improved plant growth in bush tea grown in the field. Black plastic mulch and a 0% water regime produced more compounds beneficial to health than tea treated with half or full irrigation. The extraction of data for Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Mass Spectrometry analyses was conducted for quality components. Our study did not show any distinct structural differences in the tea under different water regimes or mulching. Flavones, phenols, diterpenes, and gardoside were some of the most abundant compounds found in bush tea using mass spectrometry. Principal Component Analysis was performed on the NMR spectral data across 27 samples of bush tea.

Indexed as

1H NMRblack plastic mulchMSphysiological parameterssawdust mulchsecondary metaboliteswater regimes

Identifiers

PMID40573731
PMCPMC12197187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.