ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Depth from 2D Images: Development and Metrological Evaluation of System Uncertainty Applied to Agricultural Scenarios.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article describes the development, experimental validation, and uncertainty analysis of a simple-to-use model for monocular depth estimation based on optical flow. The idea is deeply rooted in the agricultural scenario, for which vehicles that move around the field are equipped with low-cost cameras. In the experiment, the camera was mounted on a robot moving linearly at five different constant speeds looking at the target measurands (ArUco markers) positioned at different depths. The acquired data was processed and filtered with a moving average window-based filter to reduce noise in the estimated apparent depths of the ArUco markers and in the estimated optical flow image speeds. Two methods are proposed for model validation: a generalized approach and a complete approach that separates the input data according to their image speed to account for the exponential nature of the proposed model. The practical result obtained by the two analyses is that, to reduce the impact of uncertainty on depth estimates, it is best to have image speeds higher than 500-800 px/s. This is obtained by either moving the camera faster or by increasing the camera's frame rate. The best-case scenario is achieved when the camera moves at 0.50-0.75 m/s and the frame rate is set to 60 fps (effectively reduced to 20 fps after filtering). As a further contribution, two practical examples are provided to offer guidance for untrained personnel in selecting the camera's speed and camera characteristics. The developed code is made publicly available on GitHub.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.