Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40573663›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Machine Learning-Based Identification of Plastic Types Using Handheld Spectrometers.

Hedde van Hoorn, Fahimeh Pourmohammadi, Arie-Willem de Leeuw, Amey Vasulkar, Jerry de Vos, Steven van den Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hedde van HoornPhotonics Research Group, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-6245-3011
Fahimeh PourmohammadiPhotonics Research Group, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands.
Arie-Willem de LeeuwAI & Data Science Expert Group, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9857-0970
Amey VasulkarAI & Data Science Expert Group, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3559-3593
Jerry de VosPlastic Scanner Project, 2611 AN Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-3240-1081
Steven van den BergPhotonics Research Group, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4284-8627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic waste and pollution is growing rapidly worldwide and most plastics end up in landfill or are incinerated because high-quality recycling is not possible. Plastic-type identification with a low-cost, handheld spectral approach could help in parts of the world where high-end spectral imaging systems on conveyor belts cannot be implemented. Here, we investigate how two fundamentally different handheld infrared spectral devices can identify plastic types by benchmarking the same analysis against a high-resolution bench-top spectral approach. We used the handheld Plastic Scanner, which measures a discrete infrared spectrum using LED illumination at different wavelengths, and the SpectraPod, which has an integrated photonics chip which has varying responsivity in different channels in the near-infrared. We employ machine learning using SVM, XGBoost, Random Forest and Gaussian Naïve Bayes models on a full dataset of plastic samples of PET, HDPE, PVC, LDPE, PP and PS, with samples of varying shape, color and opacity, as measured with three different experimental approaches. The high-resolution spectral approach can obtain an accuracy (mean ± standard deviation) of (0.97 ± 0.01), whereas we obtain (0.93 ± 0.01) for the SpectraPod and (0.70 ± 0.03) for the Plastic Scanner. Differences of reflectance at subsequent wavelengths prove to be the most important features in the plastic-type classification model when using high-resolution spectroscopy, which is not possible with the other two devices. Lower accuracy for the handheld devices is caused by their limitations, as the spectral range of both devices is limited-up to 1600 nm for the SpectraPod, while the Plastic Scanner has limited sensitivity to reflectance at wavelengths of 1100 and 1350 nm, where certain plastic types show characteristic absorbance bands. We suggest that combining selective sensitivity channels (as in the SpectraPod) and illuminating the sample with varying LEDs (as with the Plastic Scanner) could increase the accuracy in plastic-type identification with a handheld device.

Indexed as

benchmarkinghandheldmachine learningplastic identificationspectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40573663
PMCPMC12196715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.