ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Measurement Performance Improvement of Buried Strain Sensors for Asphalt Pavement Using Mesoscale Finite Element Simulation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately measuring strain in asphalt pavements using buried strain sensors remains challenging due to the temperature sensitivity and heterogeneity of asphalt mixtures. This study focuses on improving the measurement performance of buried strain sensors in asphalt mixtures through finite element simulations. First, the sensing errors of existing buried strain sensors in asphalt mixtures were analyzed based on laboratory experiments. Subsequently, the factors affecting the deformation compatibility between the sensor and the asphalt mixture were investigated, and the effect of asphalt mixture heterogeneity on the stability of the sensor measurements are discussed. More importantly, a series of optimization strategies for buried strain sensors are proposed. The findings suggest that the equivalent modulus of the buried strain sensor should closely match that of the asphalt mixture, and its encapsulation must avoid inducing any reinforcement effects. Considering the dynamic modulus range of the asphalt mixture, it is recommended to adopt the lower bound, such as 0.25 GPa, as the equivalent modulus of the buried sensor. To eliminate the stiffening effect, the encapsulation may utilize low-modulus flexible materials. The inherent heterogeneity of asphalt mixtures influences the measurement stability of buried strain sensors: a higher overall modulus leads to a more uniform internal strain distribution, whereas a larger nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) results in poorer strain field uniformity. Increasing the gauge length of the buried strain sensor to at least three times the NMAS significantly enhances measurement stability. This study provides valuable guidance for the design of buried strain sensors in asphalt pavement applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.