ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Risk Mitigation of a Heritage Bridge Using Noninvasive Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bridges are fundamental components of transportation infrastructure, facilitating the efficient movement of people and goods. However, the conservation of heritage bridges introduces additional challenges, encompassing environmental, social, cultural, and economic dimensions of sustainability. This study investigates risk mitigation strategies for a heritage-listed, 120-year-old reinforced concrete bridge in Australia-one of the nation's earliest examples of reinforced concrete construction, which remains operational today. The structure faces multiple risks, including passage of overweight vehicles, environmental degradation, progressive crack development due to traffic loading, and potential foundation scouring from an adjacent stream. Due to the heritage status and associated legal constraints, only non-invasive testing methods were employed. Ambient vibration testing was conducted to identify the bridge's dynamic characteristics under normal traffic conditions, complemented by non-contact displacement monitoring using laser distance sensors. A digital twin structural model was subsequently developed and validated against field data. This model enabled the execution of various "what-if" simulations, including passage of overweight vehicles and loss of foundation due to scouring, providing quantitative assessments of potential risk scenarios. Drawing on insights gained from the case study, the article proposes a six-phase Incident Response Framework tailored for heritage bridge management. This comprehensive framework incorporates remote sensing technologies for incident detection, digital twin-based structural assessment, damage containment and mitigation protocols, recovery planning, and documentation to prevent recurrence-thus supporting the long-term preservation and functionality of heritage bridge assets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.