Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40573581›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluating the Usability of Inertial Measurement Units for Measuring and Monitoring Activity Post-Stroke: A Scoping Review.

Aishwarya Shenoy, Manvir Singh Samra, Karen Van Ooteghem, Kit B Beyer, Sherri Thomson, William E McIlroy, Janice J Eng, Courtney L Pollock

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aishwarya ShenoyRehabilitation Research Program of the Centre for Aging SMART, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC V5Z 2G9, Canada.
Manvir Singh SamraDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Karen Van OoteghemDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6743-3332
Kit B BeyerDepartment of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-0579-6210
Sherri ThomsonDepartment of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0281-625X
William E McIlroyDepartment of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Janice J EngRehabilitation Research Program of the Centre for Aging SMART, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC V5Z 2G9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2093-0788
Courtney L PollockRehabilitation Research Program of the Centre for Aging SMART, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC V5Z 2G9, Canada.

Funding

Micheal Smith Foundation for Health Scholar Research n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is the most common cause of disability in adults, resulting in declines in overall activity. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) allow for the monitoring of activity patterns in various settings, informing clinical interventions and patient self-management. This review aimed to synthesize existing research evaluating the usability of IMUs for monitoring activity in people with stroke. This scoping review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for publications evaluating the usability of IMUs for monitoring activity post-stroke. Fourteen publications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in chronic stroke with data collected in real-world conditions. Usability findings indicated that most stroke participants and clinicians reported a positive user experience; however many reported difficulties with devices due to stroke-related impairments. Importantly, the interpretation of this finding was impacted by poorly reported impairments of stroke participants. Only a few studies evaluated end-user experiences (people with stroke and clinicians) in interpreting and engaging with feedback based on data from IMUs. Future usability studies in stroke populations should aim to understand participant characteristics that influence device engagement, with a focus on user experience in interpreting device-generated metrics.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationAccelerometryHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicWearable Electronic Devicesactivity monitoringstrokeusabilitywearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID40573581
PMCPMC12197292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.