ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Survey of Deep Learning-Driven 3D Object Detection: Sensor Modalities, Technical Architectures, and Applications.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- MVDFusion: Multimodal Vehicle Detection in Foggy Weather Using LiDAR and Radar Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Spectrometer-free time-division multiplexed NIR time-of-flight vision system for visually similar material recognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Neural Network-Based Conveying Object Measurement Automation System Using Distance Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hyper-MDR: An open-world multimodal reasoning framework based on dynamic hypergraph and meta-strategy optimization.PloS one · 2026Article
- IFE-CMT: Instance-Aware Fine-Grained Feature Enhancement Cross Modal Transformer for 3D Object Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Survey of Deep Learning-Based 3D Object Detection Methods for Autonomous Driving Across Different Sensor Modalities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review presents a comprehensive survey on deep learning-driven 3D object detection, focusing on the synergistic innovation between sensor modalities and technical architectures. Through a dual-axis "sensor modality-technical architecture" classification framework, it systematically analyzes detection methods based on RGB cameras, LiDAR, and multimodal fusion. From the sensor perspective, the study reveals the evolutionary paths of monocular depth estimation optimization, LiDAR point cloud processing from voxel-based to pillar-based modeling, and three-level cross-modal fusion paradigms (data-level alignment, feature-level interaction, and result-level verification). Regarding technical architectures, the paper examines structured representation optimization in traditional convolutional networks, spatiotemporal modeling breakthroughs in bird's-eye view (BEV) methods, voxel-level modeling advantages of occupancy networks for irregular objects, and dynamic scene understanding capabilities of temporal fusion architectures. The applications in autonomous driving and agricultural robotics are discussed, highlighting future directions including depth perception enhancement, open-scene modeling, and lightweight deployment to advance 3D perception systems toward higher accuracy and stronger generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.