ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancing Digital Twin Fidelity Through Low-Discrepancy Sequence and Hilbert Curve-Driven Point Cloud Down-Sampling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper addresses the critical challenge of point cloud down-sampling for digital twin creation, where reducing data volume while preserving geometric fidelity remains an ongoing research problem. We propose a novel down-sampling approach that combines Low-Discrepancy Sequences (LDS) with Hilbert curve ordering to create a method that preserves both global distribution characteristics and local geometric features. Unlike traditional methods that impose uniform density or rely on computationally intensive feature detection, our LDS-Hilbert approach leverages the complementary mathematical properties of Low-Discrepancy Sequences and space-filling curves to achieve balanced sampling that respects the original density distribution while ensuring comprehensive coverage. Through four comprehensive experiments covering parametric surface fitting, mesh reconstruction from basic closed geometries, complex CAD models, and real-world laser scans, we demonstrate that LDS-Hilbert consistently outperforms established methods, including Simple Random Sampling (SRS), Farthest Point Sampling (FPS), and Voxel Grid Filtering (Voxel). Results show parameter recovery improvements often exceeding 50% for parametric models compared to the FPS and Voxel methods, nearly 50% better shape preservation as measured by the Point-to-Mesh Distance (than FPS) and up to 160% as measured by the Viewpoint Feature Histogram Distance (than SRS) on complex real-world scans. The method achieves these improvements without requiring feature-specific calculations, extensive pre-processing, or task-specific training data, making it a practical advance for enhancing digital twin fidelity across diverse application domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.