ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
P300 ERP System Utilizing Wireless Visual Stimulus Presentation Devices.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The P300 event-related potential, evoked by attending to specific sensory stimuli, is utilized in non-invasive brain-computer interface (BCI) systems and is considered the only interface through which individuals with complete paralysis can operate devices based on their intention. Conventionally, visual stimuli used to elicit P300 have been presented using displays; however, placing a display directly in front of the user obstructs the field of view and prevents the user from perceiving their surrounding environment. Moreover, every time the user changes posture, the display must be repositioned accordingly, increasing the burden on caregivers. To address these issues, we propose a novel system that employs wirelessly controllable LED visual stimulus presentation devices distributed throughout the surrounding environment, rather than relying on traditional displays. The primary challenge in the proposed system is the communication delay associated with wireless control, which introduces errors in the timing of stimulus presentation-an essential factor for accurate P300 analysis. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate how such delays affect P300 detection accuracy. The second challenge lies in the variability of visual stimulus strength due to differences in viewing distance caused by the spatial distribution of stimulus devices. This also requires the validation of its impact on P300 detection. In Experiment 1, we evaluated system performance in terms of wireless communication delay and confirmed an average delay of 352.1 ± 30.9 ms. In Experiment 2, we conducted P300 elicitation experiments using the wireless visual stimulus presentation device under conditions that allowed the precise measurement of stimulus presentation timing. We compared P300 waveforms across three conditions: (1) using the exact measured stimulus timing, (2) using the stimulus timing with a fixed compensation of 350 ms for the wireless delay, and (3) using the stimulus timing with both the 350 ms fixed delay compensation and an additional pseudo-random error value generated based on a normal distribution. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed delay compensation method in preserving P300 waveform integrity. In Experiment 3, a system performance verification test was conducted on 21 participants using a wireless visual presentation device. As a result, statistically significant differences (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.