ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Microwire vs. Micro-Ribbon Magnetoelastic Sensors for Vibration-Based Structural Health Monitoring of Rectangular Concrete Beams.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contactless Inductive Sensors Using Glass-Coated Microwires.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two different magnetoelastic Metglas materials with distinct shapes were compared as sensing elements for the structural health monitoring of concrete beams. One had a ribbon shape, while the other had a microwire shape. The sensing elements were attached to different concrete beams, and a crack was introduced into each beam. The beams were subjected to flexural vibrations, and their deformations were recorded wirelessly by coils, detecting the magnetic signals emitted due to the magnetoelastic nature of the sensors. Fast Fourier Analysis of the received signal revealed the bending mode frequencies of the beams, which serve as a "signature" of their structural health. In these spectra, the ribbon-shaped sensor exhibited a 1.4-times stronger signal than the microwire sensor. However, the extracted mode frequencies were nearly identical, with differences of less than 1% both before and after damage. This indicates that both sensors can be used equivalently to monitor structural damage in concrete beams. The damage-related relative frequency shifts ranged from -0.01 to -0.03, with similar results for both sensors. Thermal annealing was also studied and appeared to significantly enhance the signal by 10-30%, likely due to the relaxation of internal stresses induced during the rapid solidification synthesis of these materials. This enhancement was more pronounced in the ribbon-shaped sensor. This study is the first to utilize a magnetoelastic microwire sensor for damage detection in concrete beams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.