Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40573470›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The IoT and AI in Agriculture: The Time Is Now-A Systematic Review of Smart Sensing Technologies.

Tymoteusz Miller, Grzegorz Mikiciuk, Irmina Durlik, Małgorzata Mikiciuk, Adrianna Łobodzińska, Marek Śnieg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tymoteusz MillerInstitute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5962-5334
Grzegorz MikiciukDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6547-7059
Irmina DurlikFaculty of Navigation, Maritime University of Szczecin, Waly Chrobrego 1-2, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9684-072X
Małgorzata MikiciukDepartment of Bioengineering, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5197-4428
Adrianna ŁobodzińskaInstitute of Biology, University of Szczecin, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6669-3589
Marek ŚniegDepartment of Agroengineering, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2379-6289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI) has reshaped modern agriculture by enabling precision farming, real-time monitoring, and data-driven decision-making. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA methodology, provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in smart sensing technologies for arable crops and grasslands. We analyzed the peer-reviewed literature published between 2020 and 2024, focusing on the adoption of IoT-based sensor networks and AI-driven analytics across various agricultural applications. The findings reveal a significant increase in research output, particularly in the use of optical, acoustic, electromagnetic, and soil sensors, alongside machine learning models such as SVMs, CNNs, and random forests for optimizing irrigation, fertilization, and pest management strategies. However, this review also identifies critical challenges, including high infrastructure costs, limited interoperability, connectivity constraints in rural areas, and ethical concerns regarding transparency and data privacy. To address these barriers, recent innovations have emphasized the potential of Edge AI for local inference, blockchain systems for decentralized data governance, and autonomous platforms for field-level automation. Moreover, policy interventions are needed to ensure fair data ownership, cybersecurity, and equitable access to smart farming tools, especially in developing regions. This review is the first to systematically examine AI-integrated sensing technologies with an exclusive focus on arable crops and grasslands, offering an in-depth synthesis of both technological progress and real-world implementation gaps.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceedge computinginternet of thingsprecision agricultureremote sensingsensor networkssmart farmingsoil monitoringsustainable agricultureUAV-based imaging

Identifiers

PMID40573470
PMCPMC12196926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.