Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40573357›Full record

ReviewViruses2025

Coronavirus Replication: Genomes, Subgenomic RNAs, and Defective Viral Genomes.

Rory Williams, Jack Hales, William Collier, Phillip Gould

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rory WilliamsCentre for Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 2UD, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-4559-8197
Jack HalesOVO Biomanufacturing Ltd., Friars House, Manor House Drive, Coventry CV1 2TE, UK.
William CollierOVO Biomanufacturing Ltd., Friars House, Manor House Drive, Coventry CV1 2TE, UK.
Phillip GouldCentre for Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 2UD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1230-6771

Funding

Coventry University Internal University Grant (COVID-19 Studentship)OVO Biomanufacturing Employer of some of the authors
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the process of coronavirus replication has been under increasing scrutiny. During the replication of their genomic RNA, coronaviruses produce a range of other RNAs in addition to the negative-sense replicative intermediates of the genome, which includes a set of subgenomic RNAs. These subgenomic RNAs are nested within the sequence of the complete genome and can be both replicated further and act as templates for protein production. Alongside these functional products of discontinuous replication, coronaviruses produce defective viral genomes that can potentially impact both the virus and infected host cells. These interactions can arise from the ability of these defective viral genomes to impact the production of new infectious virions, through either competition with the wild-type genome for replication or by stimulating an antiviral response. Examining the behaviour of defective viral genomes can also help to elucidate the functional elements of the genome involved in the processes of replication and packaging. This review covers the process of intracellular replication by coronaviruses describing the mechanisms by which the different RNA species are produced. Of particular focus are factors involved in discontinuous replication that produces defective viral genomes, and the behaviour of coronavirus defective viral genomes.

Indexed as

CoronavirusDefective VirusesGenome, ViralRNA, ViralVirus ReplicationAnimalsCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2RNA, Viralcoronavirusesdefective viral genomesDVGsrecombinationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40573357
PMCPMC12197778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.