ReviewViruses2025
Viral Strategies and Cellular Countermeasures That Regulate mRNA Access to the Translation Apparatus.
Review in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host-virus miRNA crosstalk in ebola virus disease.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- IRES Mutation Confers a Replicative Advantage to SVA by Enhancing Translation Efficiency.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Molecular Determinants of Species-Specific Interactions Between Protein Kinase R and Poxvirus K3 Orthologs.Viruses · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The papers introduced in the Commentary present new insights and review aspects of current knowledge concerning the competition between viruses and their hosts for the cellular translation apparatus. Viruses depend on this apparatus and utilize diverse mechanisms to usurp it for the translation of viral mRNAs and to suppress synthesis of cellular proteins. Virus-induced modification of translation factors, selective abrogation of mRNA binding to ribosomes and degradation of cellular mRNAs all impair elements of the innate immune response, thereby undermining host defenses against infection. Various cellular mechanisms prevent translation of viral mRNAs, by modifying components of the translation apparatus to effect a generalized shut-off of translation or by binding of host proteins to viral mRNAs to induce their degradation or to prevent their engagement with the translation apparatus. Viruses have in turn evolved countermeasures to evade these defenses, for example by encoding proteins that impair the activity of host factors or via alterations in the sequence and structure of viral mRNAs. Such changes enable viral mRNAs to avoid recognition by host factors or to support translation initiation by specialized mechanisms that involve only a subset of the factors that are required by cellular mRNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.