Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40573297›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Regulatory Perspectives for AI/ML Implementation in Pharmaceutical GMP Environments.

Sarfaraz K Niazi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Artificial intelligence-assisted lead optimization in drug discovery: bridging computational advances and translational challenges.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. AI/ML-based computational models for toxicity prediction.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sarfaraz K NiaziCollege of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0513-0336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into pharmaceutical manufacturing processes holds great promise for enhancing efficiency, product quality, and regulatory compliance. However, implementing good manufacturing practices (GMP) in regulated environments introduces complex challenges related to validation, data integrity, risk management, and regulatory oversight. This review article comprehensively analyzes current regulatory frameworks and guidance for AI/ML in pharmaceutical Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) settings, identifies gaps and uncertainties, and proposes considerations for future policy development. Emphasis is placed on understanding regulatory expectations across various agencies, including the US FDA, EMA, and MHRA. This article examines verified case studies and pilot programs that demonstrate the successful application of AI/ML under regulatory scrutiny, as well as recent developments in regulatory frameworks and implementation strategies. Ultimately, this article emphasizes the importance of a risk-based life cycle approach and the need for advancements in regulatory science to accommodate the dynamic nature of AI/ML technologies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)digital transformationgood manufacturing practice (GMP)machine learning (ML)pharmaceutical regulationvalidation frameworks

Identifiers

PMID40573297
PMCPMC12195787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.