ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancing Regulatory Oversight of Medical Device Trials to Align with Clinical Drug Standards in the European Union.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Commercial Translation of Electrochemical Biosensors: Supply Chain Strategy, Scale-Up Manufacturing, and Regulatory-Quality Considerations.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Integrating Biomarkers into Cervical Cancer Screening-Advances in Diagnosis and Risk Prediction: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Glymphatic-Venous Axis in Brain Clearance Failure: Aquaporin-4 Dysfunction, Biomarker Imaging, and Precision Therapeutic Frontiers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The regulation of clinical trials for medicinal products and medical devices has undergone numerous changes in recent years in the European Union, challenging manufacturers and national regulatory agencies as well. With the introduction of combined drug-device products, the regulatory landscape has been drastically changed to adapt to novel technological advancements and innovations. A comparative analysis has not yet been published highlighting the main differences and common elements of these two medicinal products, which took up almost all of the market in the pharmaceutical sector. Due to stricter regulations in the field of medical devices, the process from application up until post-market surveillance became more difficult, but a correlation between the regulation of drug trials can also be found. The main differences lie in the risk management systems, where, regardless of the background knowledge of a drug, it is always strict and mandatory structured progress, while in the case of medical devices, it is more flexible based on the risk category of the product. Generally, the utilization of e-health opportunities, transparency, and data accessibility have been improved in both fields. Via the adaptation of the mentioned regulation in the EU, the safety of patients and the efficacy of trials have been greatly increased. This manuscript aims to compare the specific regulations of these two types of medicinal products with a brief outlook on the non-EU sector as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.