ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Could Tack-Curing Influence Margin Continuity and Conversion Degree of a Universal Dual-Curing Cement?
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluating chemical and surface stability of thermoformed and 3D-printed clear aligners after intraoral exposure.PloS one · 2026Article
- Conversion and Tack-Curing of Light-Cured Veneer Luting Agents.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proper polymerization protocol is crucial for the long-term success of full-ceramic crown restorations. This study investigates the margin continuity and degree of conversion (DC) of a universal dual-curing cement under full-ceramic crowns subjected to different polymerization protocols and thermal aging. Intact human upper central incisors and canines were prepared for crowns, digitally designed, and milled from reinforced lithium silicate (Celtra Duo, Dentsply). Crowns were cemented using a universal dual-curing cement (G-Cem One, GC) with two polymerization protocols: (G1) microbrush excess removal, 1 min waiting, and 20 s light curing per side; (G2) 5 s tack curing per side, excess removal with a scaler, and 20 s light curing. Marginal adaptation was assessed using micro-computed tomography, and DC was evaluated with Raman spectroscopy before and after artificial thermal aging (10,000 cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C). Statistical comparisons were performed with significance set at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.