Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40573001›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Review of Optimization of Additively Manufactured 316/316L Stainless Steel Process Parameters, Post-Processing Strategies, and Defect Mitigation.

Usman Aziz, Marion McAfee, Ioannis Manolakis, Nick Timmons, David Tormey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Usman AzizI-Form, the Research Ireland Centre for Advanced Manufacturing, Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1813-2867
Marion McAfeeI-Form, the Research Ireland Centre for Advanced Manufacturing, Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1434-1215
Ioannis ManolakisCentre for Precision Engineering, Materials and Manufacturing Research (PEM Research Centre), Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4252-3849
Nick TimmonsWiSAR Lab, Atlantic Technological University, F92 FC93 Letterkenny, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0630-7885
David TormeyI-Form, the Research Ireland Centre for Advanced Manufacturing, Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland.

Funding

TURISE NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid progress in additive manufacturing (AM) has unlocked significant possibilities for producing 316/316L stainless steel components, particularly in industries requiring high precision, enhanced mechanical properties, and intricate geometries. However, the widespread adoption of AM-specifically Directed energy deposition (DED), selective laser melting (SLM), and electron beam melting (EBM) remains challenged by inherent process-related defects such as residual stresses, porosity, anisotropy, and surface roughness. This review critically examines these AM techniques, focusing on optimizing key manufacturing parameters, mitigating defects, and implementing effective post-processing treatments. This review highlights how process parameters including laser power, energy density, scanning strategy, layer thickness, build orientation, and preheating conditions directly affect microstructural evolution, mechanical properties, and defect formation in AM-fabricated 316/316L stainless steel. Comparative analysis reveals that SLM excels in achieving refined microstructures and high precision, although it is prone to residual stress accumulation and porosity. DED, on the other hand, offers flexibility for large-scale manufacturing but struggles with surface finish and mechanical property consistency. EBM effectively reduces thermal-induced residual stresses due to its sustained high preheating temperatures (typically maintained between 700 °C and 850 °C throughout the build process) and vacuum environment, but it faces limitations related to resolution, cost-effectiveness, and material applicability. Additionally, this review aligns AM techniques with specific defect reduction strategies, emphasizing the importance of post-processing methods such as heat treatment and hot isostatic pressing (HIP). These approaches enhance structural integrity by refining microstructure, reducing residual stresses, and minimizing porosity. By providing a comprehensive framework that connects AM techniques optimization strategies, this review serves as a valuable resource for academic and industry professionals. It underscores the necessity of process standardization and real-time monitoring to improve the reliability and consistency of AM-produced 316/316L stainless steel components. A targeted approach to these challenges will be crucial in advancing AM technologies to meet the stringent performance requirements of various high-value industrial applications.

Indexed as

316/316L stainless steeladditive manufacturing (AM)directed energy deposition (DED)electron beam melting (EBM)microstructurepost-processing treatmentsprocess parameter optimizationresidual stressselective laser melting (SLM)surface roughness

Identifiers

PMID40573001
PMCPMC12194911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.