ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Freeze-Thaw Damage of Concrete Under Subzero Temperature Curing Conditions.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine-Learning-Assisted Carbon Dots: From Algorithms to Applications and Beyond.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Materials Science and Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In high-elevation or high-latitude permafrost areas, persistent subzero temperatures significantly impact the freeze-thaw durability of concrete structures. Traditional methods for studying the frost resistance of concrete in permafrost regions do not provide a complete picture for predicting properties, and new approaches are needed using, for example, machine learning algorithms. This study utilizes four machine learning models-Support Vector Machine (SVM), extreme learning machine (ELM), long short-term memory (LSTM), and radial basis function neural network (RBFNN)-to predict freeze-thaw damage factors in concrete under low and subzero temperature conservation conditions. Building on the prediction results, the optimal model is refined to develop a new machine learning model: the Sparrow Search Algorithm-optimized Extreme Learning Machine (SSA-ELM). Furthermore, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) value analysis method is employed to interpret this model, clarifying the relationship between factors affecting the freezing resistance of concrete and freeze-thaw damage factors. In conclusion, the empirical formula for concrete freeze-thaw damage is compared and validated against the prediction results from the SSA-ELM model. The study results indicate that the SSA-ELM model offers the most accurate predictions for concrete freeze-thaw resistance compared to the SVM, ELM, LSTM, and RBFNN models. SHAP value analysis quantitatively confirms that the number of freeze-thaw cycles is the most significant input parameter affecting the freeze-thaw damage coefficient of concrete. Comparative analysis shows that the accuracy of the SSA-ELMDE prediction set is improved by 15.46%, 9.19%, 21.79%, and 11.76%, respectively, compared with the prediction results of SVM, ELM, LSTM, and RBF. This parameter positively influences the prediction results for the freeze-thaw damage coefficient. Curing humidity has the least influence on the freeze-thaw damage factor of concrete. Comparing the prediction results with empirical formulas shows that the machine learning model provides more accurate predictions. This introduces a new approach for predicting the extent of freeze-thaw damage to concrete under low and subzero temperature conservation conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.