ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effects of Thermal Cycles on Mechanical Properties of RPECC: Static and Dynamic Compressive Performance.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the impact of thermal cycling and rubber particle content on the static and dynamic compressive properties of rubber-polyethylene fiber-reinforced engineered cementitious composites (RPECC). Through static and dynamic compression tests, supplemented by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, the mechanical behavior and microstructural evolution of RPECC under thermal cycling were analyzed. Results indicate that increasing rubber content from 10% to 30% enhances toughness and strain capacity but reduces the static compressive strength of ECC by up to 17.9% at 30%. Thermal cycling reduced strength: static and dynamic compressive strengths decreased by 18.0% and 41.2%, respectively, after 270 cycles. Dynamic tests demonstrated that RPECC is sensitive to strain rate. For example, C-20 specimens exhibited increases in dynamic strength of 6.9% and 9.9% as strain rate rose from 60.2 s
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.