Physico-Mechanical and Sorption Properties of Wood Treated with Cellulose Nanofibers.

Magdalena Woźniak, Jerzy Majka, Tomasz Krystofiak, Barbara Lis, Edward Roszyk, Izabela Ratajczak

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magdalena WoźniakDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 75, 60625 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1863-5122

Jerzy MajkaDepartment of Wood Science and Thermal Techniques, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60637 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6713-8077

Tomasz KrystofiakDepartment of Wood Science and Thermal Techniques, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60637 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2060-0295

Barbara LisDepartment of Wood Science and Thermal Techniques, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60637 Poznan, Poland.

Edward RoszykDepartment of Wood Science and Thermal Techniques, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60637 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7508-0610

Izabela RatajczakDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 75, 60625 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3026-5192

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents the effect of wood treatment with cellulose nanofibers on its parameters. The wettability, color changes (also after UV+IR radiation), equilibrium moisture content and mechanical parameters of wood treated with cellulose nanofibers (CNF) in three concentrations (0.5, 1 and 2%) were determined. Wood treatment with CNF increased the wettability of its surface, as evidenced by lower values of the contact angle (24.3-56.3 degrees) compared to untreated wood (98.3 degrees). The SEM images indicated the formation of cellulose nanofiber networks on the wood surface, especially in the case of 2% CNF-treated wood, which formed a well-adhered and homogenous film. Wood treated with 0.5% CNF showed a lower total color change (∆

Indexed as

color changeequilibrium moisture contentmodulus of elasticitynanocellulosewettabilitywood

Identifiers

PMID40572895

DOI10.3390/ma18122762

PMCPMC12195487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.