ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of Polymer Composites Reinforced with Charcoal Particulate.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concentration-Dependent Thermo-Oxidative Degradation Behavior and Filler Loading Effects in Talc- and Whisker-Reinforced PP/EOR Composites.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Hardness and Impact Strength of Epoxy-Glass Composites Modified with Carbonisate from MDF Pyrolysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Naturally reinforced polymer composites have emerged as a promising sustainable alternative to conventional polymers due to their biodegradability. This study aimed to develop a composite by incorporating charcoal particulate into a recycled high-density polyethylene (HDPE) matrix and evaluating its mechanical properties. Two manufacturing methods (compression molding and extrusion) and four charcoal concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 15%) were investigated. Characterization involved tensile tests and non-destructive evaluation using wave propagation and ultrasound techniques. The experiment followed a completely randomized design with a 4 × 2 factorial arrangement, comprising eight treatments. Statistical analysis was conducted using Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. The tensile test results indicated that the manufacturing methods of compression molding and extrusion led to significant differences in the elastic modulus (MOE) variable, in contrast to the results observed for the maximum stress variable. However, the addition of charcoal particulate caused a notable reduction in maximum tensile strength (approximately 50%), from 20.17 to 11.19 MPa, and a 22% decrease in the MOE, from 310.93 to 242.88 MPa, compared to unreinforced HDPE. Non-destructive testing confirmed the tensile test findings, also indicating a reduction in MOE. Despite the decline in mechanical properties, these composites remain viable for applications prioritizing lightweight structures, thermal insulation, or chemical resistance. Furthermore, their use enhances the valorization of waste and increases sustainability by reducing environmental impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.