ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimization of Activated Carbon Synthesis from Spent Coffee Grounds for Enhanced Adsorption Performance.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spent Coffee Grounds as an Adsorbent Material for Metal Ions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As an adsorbent, biomass activated carbon is effective at the removal of a wide range of organic and inorganic pollutants; however, its synthesis remains complex. Although spent coffee grounds (SCG) could be an effective material for the production of activated carbon, achieving a sufficient surface area has proven to be difficult. Here, this study presents a preliminary investigation into the optimal manufacturing conditions of activated-carbon adsorbents derived from SCG. SCG samples were characterized according to proximate analysis, elementary analysis, surface area, and pore volumes, then subjected to various processes (i.e., drying, carbonization, and chemical activation) with different operating parameters (temperature and time). The samples were optimized as follows: (1) Stable drying of SCG with a high moisture content of approximately 65% required consumption energy of 49 kWh/kg and drying at 105 °C for 20 h. (2) By comparing changes in the consumption energy and product yield with an increasing amount of carbon fraction, it was found that drying carbonization was more suitable than hydrothermal carbonization for SCG. The optimum drying carbonization temperature for achieving attractive biochar was 500 °C for 1 h. (3) Activated carbon with the optimum surface area (3687 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.