ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Conventional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Hyperspectral Imaging: Similarities, Differences, Advantages, and Limitations.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of NIR Spectroscopy and Chemometrics for Food Authentication and Safety: Detection of Adulterants and Contaminants.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging non-invasive tools for hair follicle assessment: a narrative review on hyperspectral and terahertz imaging.Lasers in medical science · 2026Review
- Interpretable Spectral Evidence Learning from Vis/NIR Imaging for Non-Destructive Authentication of Herbal Medicines.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancing Egg Freshness Evaluation with Integrated AI and Spectroscopy.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in Hyperspectral Imaging for Nondestructive Food Quality and Safety Detection.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Dual Imaging Approach Using Laser-Induced Fluorescence and Hyperspectral Reflectance for Automated Sorting of White Polyamide in Mixed Waste.Journal of fluorescence · 2026Article
- Machine learning assisted intelligent identification strategy for adulteration peanut oil based on fatty acid GC fingerprint.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Bioactives fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although, the use of sensors is increasing in a wide range of fields with great success (e.g., food, environment, pharma, etc.), their uptake is slow and lower than other innovations. While the uptake is low, some users, producers, and service industries are continuing to benefit from the incorporation of technology in their business. Among these technologies, vibrational spectroscopy has demonstrated its benefits and versatility in a wide range of applications. Both conventional near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging (HSI) systems are two of the main techniques utilized in a wide range of applications in different fields. These techniques use the NIR region of the electromagnetic spectrum (750-2500 nm). Specifically, NIR-HSI systems provide spatial information and spectral data, while conventional NIR spectroscopy provides spectral information from a single point. Even though there is a clear distinction between both techniques in terms of their benefits, confusion still exists among users about their similarities and differences. This paper provides a critical discussion of the main advantages and limitations of both techniques, focusing on food science applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.