ArticleMicromachines2025
Compaction-Aware Flash Memory Remapping for Key-Value Stores.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid development of big data and artificial intelligence, the demand for memory has exploded. As a key data structure in modern databases and distributed storage systems, the Log-Structured Merge Tree (LSM-tree) has been widely employed (such as LevelDB, RocksDB, etc.) in systems based on key-value pairs due to its efficient writing performance. In LSM-tree-based KV stores, typically deployed on systems with DRAM-SSD storage, the KV items are first organized into MemTable as buffer for SSTables in main memory. When the buffer size exceeds the threshold, MemTable is flushed to the SSD and reorganized into an SSTable, which is then passed down level by level through compaction. However, the compaction degrades write performance and SSD endurance due to significant write amplification. To address this issue, recent proposals have mostly focused on redesigning the structure of LSM trees. We discover the prevalence of unchanged data blocks (UDBs) in the LSM-tree compaction process, i.e., UDBs are written back to SSD the same as they are read into memory, which induces extra write amplification and degrades I/O performance. In this paper, we propose a KV store design in SSD, called RemapCom, to exploit remapping on these UDBs. RemapCom first identifies UDBs with a lightweight state machine integrated into the compaction merge process. In order to increase the ratio of UDBs, RemapCom further designs a UDB retention method to further develop the benefit of remapping. Moreover, we implement a prototype of RemapCom on LevelDB by providing two primitives for the remapping. Compared to the state of the art, the evaluation results demonstrate that RemapCom can reduce write amplification by up to 53% and improve write throughput by up to 30%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.