ArticleMicromachines2025
On the Effects of 3D Printed Mold Material, Curing Temperature, and Duration on Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Curing Characteristics for Lab-on-a-Chip Applications.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Materials for liver-on-a-chip: modules, properties, and future directions.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Defining Operational Limits of Low-Cost MSLA 3D Printing for Microfluidic Systems: Resin Performance, Cell Compatibility, and Fluid Dynamics.ACS omega · 2026Article
- A Review on the Research Progress of Imprint Film Materials for Nanoimprint Lithography.Micromachines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soft lithography with microfabricated molds is a widely used manufacturing method. Recent advancements in 3D printing technologies have enabled microscale feature resolution, providing a promising alternative for mold fabrication. It is well established that the curing of PDMS is influenced by parameters such as temperature, time, and curing agent ratio. This study was conducted to address inconsistencies in PDMS curing observed when using different 3D-printed mold materials during the development of a Lab-on-a-Chip (LoC) system, which is typically employed for investigating the effect of hydrodynamic cavitation on blood clot disintegration. To evaluate the impact of mold material on PDMS curing behavior, PDMS was cast into molds made from polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), resin, and aluminum, and cured at controlled temperatures (55, 65, and 75 °C) for various durations (2, 6, and 12 h). Curing performance was assessed using Soxhlet extraction, Young's modulus calculations derived from Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), and complementary characterization methods. The results indicate that the mold material significantly affects PDMS curing kinetics due to differences in thermal conductivity and surface interactions. Notably, at 65 °C, PDMS cured in aluminum molds had a higher Young's modulus (~1.84 MPa) compared to PLA (~1.23 MPa) and PET (~1.17 MPa), demonstrating that the mold material can be leveraged to tailor the mechanical properties. These effects were especially pronounced at lower curing temperatures, where PLA and PET molds offered better control over PDMS elasticity, making them suitable for applications requiring flexible LoC devices. Based on these findings, 3D-printed PLA molds show strong potential for PDMS-based microdevice fabrication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.