ArticleMicromachines2025
Common Food-Wrap Film as a Cost-Effective and Readily Available Alternative to Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) Membranes for Microfluidic On-Chip Valves and Pumps.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidic devices rely on precise fluid control to enable complex operations in diagnostics, chemical synthesis, and biological research. Central to this control are microvalves, which regulate on-chip flow but require flexible membranes for active operation. While the laser cutting of thermoplastics offers a fast, automated method for fabricating rigid microfluidic components, integrating flexible elements like valves and pumps remains a key challenge. Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) membranes have been adopted to address this need but are costly and difficult to procure reliably. In this study, we present commercial food-wrap film (FWF) as a low-cost, widely available alternative membrane material. We demonstrate FWF's compatibility with laser-cut thermoplastic microfluidic devices by successfully fabricating Quake-style valves and peristaltic pumps. FWF valves maintained reliable sealing at 40 psi, maintained stable flow rates of ~1.33 μL/min during peristaltic operation, and sustained over one million continuous actuation cycles without performance degradation. Burst pressure testing confirmed robustness up to 60 psi. Additionally, FWF's thermal resistance up to 140 °C enabled effective thermal bonding with PMMA layers, simplifying device assembly. These results establish FWF as a viable substitute for TPU membranes, offering an accessible and scalable solution for microfluidic device fabrication, particularly in resource-limited settings where TPU availability is constrained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.