A Pipette for High-Resolution Sampling and Delivery of pL Bio-Samples.

Ziyang Han, Pengfei Gong, Hengxiang Su, Zehang Gao, Shilun Feng, Jianlong Zhao

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ziyang HanState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China.

Pengfei GongState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China.

Hengxiang SuXiangfu Laboratory, Jiashan 314102, China.

Zehang GaoState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6410-6440

Shilun FengState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2560-2417

Jianlong ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China No.2023YFA0915200, 2023YFA0915204the equipment research and development projects of the Chinese Academy of Sciences PTYQ2024BJ0007the equipment research and development projects of the Chinese Academy of Sciences PTYQ2024YZ0010the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Project XTCX-KJ-2024-038

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional laboratory methods for handling valuable biological samples typically use pipettes or needles, which are prone to issues such as dead volume and sample waste. Furthermore, the sampling and processing of pathogenic bacteria, such as

Indexed as

biological detectionE. colimicrodropletmicrofluidic systemsampling pipette

Identifiers

PMID40572350

DOI10.3390/mi16060630

PMCPMC12195456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.