ArticleMicromachines2025
Kinetostatic Modeling and Performance Analysis of Redundant-Actuated 4-PSS&S Compliant Parallel 3-DOF Micro-Rotation Mechanism.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a novel redundant-actuated 4-PSS&S compliant parallel micro-rotation mechanism (P represents the actuated prismatic joint and S denotes the spherical pair) with three rotational degrees of freedom. First, compliance models of the flexure spherical hinge, each branch and the whole mechanism are established using the compliance matrix method. Then, the mechanism is simplified as an equivalent spring system to establish two kinetostatic models, with their correctness validated through finite element simulations. Finally, a comparative analysis is conducted on the performance of the 3-PSS&S mechanism, non-redundant-actuated 4-PSS&S mechanism and redundant-actuated 4-PSS&S mechanism. The results show the following: ① For the 4-PSS&S mechanism, redundant actuation with optimized actuating force distribution effectively reduces the peak actuating force by up to 50% (average 40.95%), achieving an average 10.79% reduction compared to the 3-PSS&S mechanism. ② The 4-PSS&S mechanism's output stiffness increases by 26.68% in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.