ArticleMicroorganisms2025
The Patterns and Environmental Factors of Diversity, Co-Occurrence Networks, and Assembly Processes of Protistan Communities in Bulk Soils of Forests.
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protist-mediated microbiome governance: Integrating trophic ecology, rhizosphere biology, and biotechnological potential.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Network Topology and Undominated Assembly Processes Govern Soil Nematode Community Responses to Forest Type.Microorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the maintenance of soil protists within forest ecosystems is crucial for comprehending ecosystem responses to climate change. A comprehensive analysis of soil samples from the Fengtongzhai National Reserve in China, utilizing high-throughput sequencing and network analysis, indicates that topsoil protistan communities predominantly comprise consumers, parasites, and plant pathogens. The principal phyla identified include Stramenopiles, Alveolates, Rhizaria (SAR), Cercozoa, Apicomplexa, and Ciliophora, with Monocystis, Rhogostoma, Cercomonas, and Globisporangium as the most prevalent genera. Although α diversity metrics did not reveal significant differences across various forest types, β diversity demonstrated notable distinctions, primarily influenced by soil pH, organic carbon content, and moisture levels. Complex co-occurrence networks were particularly evident in deciduous broadleaved and evergreen broadleaved mixed forests. The stability of these networks was higher in plantation forests compared with natural forests, with no significant differences observed among the three natural forest types studied. This finding challenges the reliability of using soil protists as indicators for forest soil health assessments. Stochastic processes, especially ecological drift, play a significant role in shaping these communities. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the mechanisms underlying the enhanced stability of co-occurrence networks of soil protists in plantations require further investigation. Additionally, the specific responses of soil protists to forest type highlight the necessity of incorporating multidimensional indicators in the evaluation of forest soil health and the effectiveness of ecological restoration efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.