Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40572119›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2025

In Vitro Characterization and Safety Assessment of

Nwabisa Happiness Kokwe, Freedom Tshabuse, Feroz Mahomed Swalaha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nwabisa Happiness KokweDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4001, South Africa.
Freedom TshabuseDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-3379
Feroz Mahomed SwalahaDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9184-1360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In poultry production, antibiotics have been excessively used as growth promoters to support well-being and decrease mortality caused by pathogenic microorganisms. The overuse of antibiotics has led to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the presence of antibiotic residues in poultry products. To counteract this problem, probiotics could be used as adjuncts or as substitutes for preserving a diverse and balanced microflora to prevent the colonization and multiplication of pathogenic bacteria in the GI tract. This study aimed to isolate and characterize the potential probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria from the small intestine of 23-week-old broiler breeders, with the goal of identifying potential probiotic candidates. Four phenotypically healthy broiler breeders were selected, and intestinal contents were aseptically collected and cultured on MRS agar. From the initial pool of 39 colonies, six isolates were identified based on Gram-positive and catalase-negative characteristics and further classified using 16S rRNA sequencing as

Indexed as

gastrointestinal systemlactic acid bacteriapoultryprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID40572119
PMCPMC12195246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.