ArticleMicroorganisms2025
How Common Is Imported Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Romania? Two Case Reports.
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imported Visceral Leishmaniasis in Timiș County, Western Romania.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Vector-Borne Infections in Romania: From Surveillance to Prediction.Microorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeishmaniasis is a vector-borne zoonotic disease caused by protozoa of the genus CASE PRESENTATION: We report two cases of imported cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) diagnosed in central Romania, a region without previously confirmed human or animal cases. The first case involved a 31-year-old male with a recent travel history to Spain, presenting with erythematous papules and plaques that evolved into ulcerated lesions. The diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically and by a PCR. Treatment with miltefosine was effective, with minimal hepatic toxicity and a sustained response at a six-month follow-up. The second case concerned an 11-year-old boy who had traveled to Elba, Italy. He developed ulcerative lesions that progressed rapidly and were complicated by DISCUSSION: These cases highlight the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges associated with CL in non-endemic settings. The varied clinical evolution underscores the importance of considering leishmaniasis in the differential diagnosis of chronic, non-healing cutaneous lesions, particularly in patients with a travel history to endemic regions.
conclusionsIncreased awareness among clinicians, supported by accurate diagnostic tools and public health surveillance, is essential to identify and manage imported leishmaniasis. Given the absence of a licensed vaccine and the growing risk of vector expansion in Eastern Europe, these cases support the WHO's inclusion of leishmaniasis among the priority neglected tropical diseases targeted for intensified global control efforts by 2030.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.