Effects of the Addition of Microbial Agents After Dazomet Fumigation on the Microbial Community Structure in Soils with Continuous Cropping of Strawberry (

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Synthetic microbial communities mediate maize growth and soil microecology under saline-alkali stress.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
   Article
2. The Effect of Indigenous Cultivable Microorganism Inoculation on Soil Microecology During Restoration of Obstructed Soils.Microorganisms · 2026
   Article
3. Microbial agents enhance the yield and quality of pears by regulating the composition and networks of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as