Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40572035›Full record

ReviewCA: a cancer journal for clinicians

The contemporary management of prostate cancer.

Deep Chakrabarti, Peter Albertsen, Aidan Adkins, Amar Kishan, Vedang Murthy, Chris Parker, Angela Pathmanathan, Alison Reid, Oliver Sartor, Nicholas Van As and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Navigating work after prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. GMP-compliant automated synthesis and quality control of [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Deep ChakrabartiUro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9511-6844
Peter AlbertsenUConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Aidan AdkinsEuropa Uomo, Antwerp, Belgium.
Amar KishanRonald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Vedang MurthyTata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Center for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Chris ParkerUro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK.
Angela PathmanathanUro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK.
Alison ReidUro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8567-4941
Oliver SartorMayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Nicholas Van AsUro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK.
Jochen WalzInstitut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1379-7608
Alison TreeUro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK C33589/A28284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in two thirds of the world, with an expected doubling in both incidence and mortality in the next two decades. No strong environmental associations exist for the development of prostate cancer; therefore, lifestyle measures are unlikely to mitigate this increasing burden. The last three decades have seen rapid developments in the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of prostate cancer, including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, robotic surgery, image-guided hypofractionated and stereotactic radiotherapy, novel anti-androgens and radioligand therapies. Prostate cancer is unique in that not everyone with a diagnosis needs treatment, and active surveillance is the preferred option for some. This review discusses the contemporary management of all stages of prostate cancer in the light of these modern developments, enabling holistic individualization of treatment, and describes the promise of future research to further improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsHumansMaleMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiosurgeryRobotic Surgical ProceduresAndrogen Antagonistsmedical oncologyprostate neoplasmsradiation oncologysurvivorshipurology

Identifiers

PMID40572035
PMCPMC12593286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.