Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40571952›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2025

Practice-Level Clustering of Industry Payments to Clinicians.

Max J Hyman, Micah T Prochaska, Parth K Modi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Max J HymanThe Center for Health and the Social Sciences, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9829-5868
Micah T ProchaskaThe Center for Health and the Social Sciences, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Parth K ModiSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Bucksbaum-Siegler Institute for Clinical Excellence
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test whether industry payments to clinicians are clustered at the level of the medical practice. STUDY SETTING AND

designWe performed a cross-sectional study of clinicians who billed Medicare Part B in 2021 to test whether the receipt of an industry payment, log total value of industry payments, or log total number of industry payments to clinicians were clustered at the level of the medical practice. We used mixed effects linear regression to analyze practice-level clustering, controlling for clinician sex, age, urbanicity, state, and specialty, as well as practice size and specialty. DATA SOURCE AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: We used the 2021 Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty file to assign clinicians to medical practices, and the 2021 General Payment Data from the Open Payments Program to calculate the total value and number of industry payments to each clinician. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe identified 996,982 clinicians who billed Medicare Part B in 2021, of whom 679,577 (68.2%) were physicians and 317,305 (31.8%) were advanced practice clinicians. These clinicians worked across 109,952 medical practices. In total, 474,312 (47.6%) clinicians received an industry payment in 2021. The average total value of industry payments was $1497 (SD $54,823), and the average total number of industry payments was 9.4 (SD 27.5). Regression analysis of each outcome identified significant clustering at the level of the medical practice, including 24.8% of the variation in the receipt of an industry payment, 36.8% in the log total value of industry payments, and 60.5% in the log total number of industry payments.

conclusionsIndustry payments to clinicians are strongly clustered by medical practice. Future research should examine the role of the medical practice in facilitating financial conflicts of interest between industry and clinicians.

Indexed as

Conflict of InterestIndustryMedicare Part BPhysiciansCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleUnited Statesadvanced practice cliniciansclusteringconflicts of interestindustry paymentsmedical practicephysicians

Identifiers

PMID40571952
PMCPMC12636257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.