ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2026
stGNN: Spatially Informed Cell-Type Deconvolution Based on Deep Graph Learning and Statistical Modeling.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SA2E: spatial-aware auto-encoder for cell type deconvolution of spatial transcriptomics data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Enhancing and accelerating cell type deconvolution of large-scale spatial transcriptomics slices with dual network model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in spatial transcriptomics (ST) technologies have greatly revolutionized our understanding of tissue heterogeneity and cellular functions. However, popular ST, such as 10x Visium, still fall short in achieving true single-cell resolution, underscoring an urgent need for in-silico methods that can accurately resolve cell type composition within ST data. While several methods have been proposed, most rely solely on gene expression profiles, often neglecting spatial context, which results in suboptimal performance. Additionally, many deconvolution methods dependent on scRNA-seq data fail to align the distribution of ST and scRNA-seq reference data, consequently affecting the accuracy of cell type mapping. In this study, we propose stGNN, a novel spatially-informed graph learning framework powered by statistical modeling for resolving fine-grained cell type compositions in ST. To capture comprehensive features, we develop a dual encoding module, utilizing both a graph convolutional network (GCN) and an auto-encoder to learn spatial and non-spatial representations respectively. Following that, we further design an adaptive attention mechanism to integrate these representations layer-by-layer, capturing multi-scale spatial structures from low to high order and thus improving representation learning. Additionally, for model training, we adopt a negative log-likelihood loss function that aligns the distribution of ST data with scRNA-seq (or snRNA-seq) reference data, enhancing the accuracy of cell type proportion prediction in ST. To assess the performance of stGNN, we applied our proposed model to six ST datasets from various platforms, including 10x Visium, Slide-seqV2, and Visium HD, for cell type proportion estimation. Our results demonstrate that stGNN consistently outperforms seven state-of-the-art methods. Notably, when applied to mouse brain tissues, stGNN successfully resolves clear cortical layers at a high resolution. Additionally, we show that stGNN is able to effectively resolve ST at different resolutions. In summary, stGNN provides a powerful framework for analyzing the spatial distribution of diverse cell populations in complex tissue structures. stGNN's code is openly shared on https://github.com/LiangSDNULab/stGNN .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40571903What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.