ArticleScientific reports2025
AI driven prediction of early age compressive strength in ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable mixture design of rice husk ash cement based concrete: performance optimization through data driven modeling and multi objective analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting unconfined compressive strength of geopolymer-stabilized clays using a sector fruit fly-based extreme learning machine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-driven sustainable strength prediction and experimental evaluation of high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete incorporating metakaolin.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Synergic utilization of waste glass powder for fire-resilient and low alkali-activated concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An adaptive extended radial basis function based interval analysis method for structural engineering solutions.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine learning based optimization of fly ash content for improving geopolymer concrete compressive strength.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Strength Prediction and Sustainability Analysis of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) is an exceptional type of cementitious composite with superior mechanical and durability performances. Achieving these properties involves maintaining a low water-to-cement ratio, optimizing aggregate size distribution, and integrating fiber reinforcement. Recently, there has been a notable trend in the development and application of UHPFRCs. However, there is still a requirement for artificial intelligence (AI) methods to predict the early-age compressive strength (CS) of UHPFRC and to define the key input factors for optimal mix design with appropriate proportions. Therefore, five AI models were chosen to assess the predictive accuracy of early-age CS in the current study. These models include support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), gradient boosting (GB), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). As part of evaluating model performance and conducting error analysis, this study investigated differences in prediction accuracy among five models across training and testing datasets. Additionally, feature importance analysis was implemented to explore the influence of the input variables on the early-age CS. Results indicate that GPR and SVR models with high predictive accuracy (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.