Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40571697›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

AI driven prediction of early age compressive strength in ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete.

Mohamed Abdellatief, Wafa Hamla, Hassan Hamouda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed AbdellatiefDepartment of Civil Engineering, Higher Future Institute of Engineering and Technology in Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt. drmohamedabdellatief8@gmail.com.
Wafa HamlaUniversity Mohamed El Bachir El Ibrahimi of Bordj Bou Arreridj, Bordj Bou Arreridj, Algeria.
Hassan HamoudaCivil and Architectural Construction Department, Faculty of Technology and Education, Suez University, Suez, Egypt. Hassan.hamouda@ind.suezuni.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) is an exceptional type of cementitious composite with superior mechanical and durability performances. Achieving these properties involves maintaining a low water-to-cement ratio, optimizing aggregate size distribution, and integrating fiber reinforcement. Recently, there has been a notable trend in the development and application of UHPFRCs. However, there is still a requirement for artificial intelligence (AI) methods to predict the early-age compressive strength (CS) of UHPFRC and to define the key input factors for optimal mix design with appropriate proportions. Therefore, five AI models were chosen to assess the predictive accuracy of early-age CS in the current study. These models include support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), gradient boosting (GB), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). As part of evaluating model performance and conducting error analysis, this study investigated differences in prediction accuracy among five models across training and testing datasets. Additionally, feature importance analysis was implemented to explore the influence of the input variables on the early-age CS. Results indicate that GPR and SVR models with high predictive accuracy (R

Indexed as

Early-age compressive strengthGaussian process regression- feature importance analysisUHPFRC

Identifiers

PMID40571697
PMCPMC12202810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.