Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40571430›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open respiratory research2025

Can measures of small airway dysfunction aid with the diagnosis or management of asthma exacerbations? A systematic review.

Abdulrahman Alshehri, Mohammed Ibrahim Alshahrani, Elizabeth Sapey, Robert Andrew Stockley, Mohammed Almeshari

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Phenotyping treatment-naive uncontrolled asthma in adults: A primary care framework.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdulrahman AlshehriThe Department of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK asa274@student.bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4994-4357
Mohammed Ibrahim AlshahraniThe Department of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1475-3010
Elizabeth SapeyUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-5482
Robert Andrew StockleyQueen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-1207
Mohammed AlmeshariHealth Rehabilitaion Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8449-9491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma exacerbations are acute episodes with worsened symptoms and decreased lung function. Current diagnosis relies on clinical assessment and spirometry, lacking a gold standard test. Interest in small airways tests suggests they may identify treatable traits. This review examines evidence for using small airways tests in diagnosing and managing exacerbations.

methodsThe protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, and the systematic review followed standard methodology. Multiple electronic databases were searched, including MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library). The search strategy combined subject headings and keywords related to asthma exacerbations and small airway function tests. Observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing these tests for detecting or monitoring exacerbations in adults (≥18 years) were included, without language or date restrictions. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for RCTs.

resultsSeven studies (six observational, one RCT) met the inclusion criteria. Five included forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75), also referred to as maximal mid-expiratory flow; one used isolated forced expiratory flow measures (FEF25, FEF50 and FEF75); and one included multiple breath washout (MBW). No study specifically tested whether small airway function tests improved the diagnosis or monitoring of exacerbations. However, all showed worsening small airway measures during exacerbations, which improved on recovery. FEF25-75 showed greater percentage change than forced expiratory volume in one second postrecovery. The MBW study reported increased acinar ventilation heterogeneity (Sacin) and conductive ventilation heterogeneity (Scond), suggesting small airway involvement.

conclusionConducting physiological tests for small airway function appears feasible during an exacerbation. These tests may have utility in the diagnosis or monitoring of acute asthma exacerbations. However, existing studies are heterogeneous and further research is needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024494994.

Indexed as

AsthmaRespiratory Function TestsAdultDisease ProgressionForced Expiratory VolumeHumansObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpirometryVital CapacityAsthmaRespiratory Function Test

Identifiers

PMID40571430
PMCPMC12207187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.