ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2025
Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults With Myelodysplastic Syndrome With 65 Years or Older Compared to Youngers. A Retrospective Analysis of the Latin America Registry.
Article in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective multicenter study aimed to compare outcomes and evaluate risks associated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in myelodysplastic syndrome patients aged ≥ 65 versus < 65 years in Latin America, across 38 transplant centers (1988-2023). Of the 441 patients, 70 (16%) were ≥ 65 years (median age 68 ± 3.7). At 5 years, overall survival (OS) was 49.3% in patients ≥ 65 vs. 56.7% in those < 65 (p = 0.49), and progression-free survival (PFS) was 48.4% vs. 56.2% (p = 0.40). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 13.6%, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) 33.8%. After propensity score matching, no significant differences were observed between the age groups in OS (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.76-1.77; p = 0.488), NRM (HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.64-1.67; p = 0.90) or PFS (HR = 1.20; 95% CI: 0.779-1.83; p = 0.40). PFS in patients ≥ 65 years was associated with high-risk IPSS-R stratification (p = 0.0056). The age group ≥ 65 years conferred higher risk of relapse compared to patients aged < 65 years (HR = 2.77; 95% CI: 1.07-7.15; p = 0.035). In patients ≥ 65 years, prevalence risk was associated to male sex, reduced-intensity conditioning, mobilized blood cells, and prior treatment, while in those < 65 years, to complications and chronic GVHD (p < 0.05). HCT is feasible in elderly patients. However, age may influence disease progression in very high-risk elderly patients and risk of relapse after transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.