ArticleEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2025
Streaming and redirection of lower acuity adult patients attending the ED: patient and staff experience.
Article in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Patient navigation to cooperation practices : Experiences from pilot projects on redirecting emergency department patients].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Article
- Structural empowerment of triage nurses in the redirection of low-acuity patients in a Swiss emergency department: a mixed-methods convergent pilot study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Follow-Up of Low-Acuity Patients After Redirection From a Swiss Emergency Department Using an Electronic Triage Application: Protocol for a Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Observational
- Safety and Effectiveness of Fast-Track Systems in Pediatric Urgent Care Units: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStreaming and redirection in the ED involves the assessment, triage and prioritisation of patients. Lower acuity patients can be streamed to alternative services within the hospital or redirected to off-site services with the aim of alleviating ED clinical pressures. This study aimed to understand staff, patient, family members and carers' experiences of streaming and redirection, including patients and staff who used an NHS web-based application.
methodsA semistructured interview study with staff working in the ED involved in streaming delivery and adult patients and family members who had attended the ED for conditions that could be safely managed in lower acuity settings. Participants were recruited from two NHS Hospital sites in England, one using a web-based NHS urgent care self-service product (digital tool) and one using a nurse-led streaming model. Recruitment took place between August and December 2023.
results28 interviews were completed. Participants across both sites commented on the challenges of streaming and redirection and confusion around where patients needed to go for what conditions. Patients and staff felt that the lack of capacity in alternative services limited the effectiveness of streaming and redirection. Three themes developed: 'it's too muddy': disruption to the flow of care, balancing privacy and efficiency in streaming and redirection, pressures in the wider healthcare system beyond the ED.
conclusionsThis research has implications for understanding patient and staff experiences of streaming and redirection approaches, and the need for clear communication and navigation when utilising digital technologies in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.