ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2025
Characterisation and prevalence of inherited retinal diseases in the Finnish population reveals enrichment of population-specific phenotypes and causative variants.
Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology of macular dystrophy in Japan (2011-2020): a nationwide population-based study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Review
- Gene therapy in patients with choroideremia: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- The Genetic Landscape of Inherited Retinal Diseases in the Israeli Population.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Psychosocial observations in ocular genetics consultations: from genetic diagnosis to rehabilitation.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Deciphering the genetic basis of inherited retinal dystrophies via whole-exome sequencing in a Turkish cohort.Molecular vision · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study aims to assess clinical and genetic characteristics as well as the prevalence of inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) and their subphenotypes in the Finnish founder population.
methodsA retrospective analysis of clinical and genetic data from Northern Finnish patients diagnosed with IRD between 1996 and 2023 at Oulu University Hospital, Finland, was conducted.
resultsThe cohort comprised 582 patients with IRD, categorised into 16 different subphenotypes. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants explaining IRD were identified in 36% (n=210/582) of all patients and 80% (n=210/261) of genetically tested patients with IRD. Diagnostic yields varied between different IRD subphenotypes. The genetic aetiology was most commonly confirmed in X-linked retinoschisis, severe early childhood-onset retinal dystrophy, congenital stationary night blindness and choroideremia. The lowest rates of causative variant identification were observed in cone or cone-rod dystrophy and macular dystrophy. In total, 70 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified across 39 different genes; variants in the
conclusionThe Northern Finnish population exhibits an enrichment of population-specific IRD-associated variants, resulting in a high overall prevalence of IRDs and an increased prevalence of selected retinal subphenotypes, such as retinoschisis, choroideremia and Usher syndrome types 3 and 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.