ArticleNanotechnology2025
Computer vision techniques for high-speed atomic force microscopy of DNA molecules.
Article in Nanotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-speed atomic force microscopy (HSAFM) can produce thousands of topographic, nanoscale images over a small area. One emerging application of this technique is the detection and sizing of single DNA molecules derived from biological experiments and genetic testing. Using HSAFM images, researchers can visually categorize healthy and mutant DNA based on size and sequence-specific labeling, leading to rapid, high precision diagnostics. However, manually sifting through large numbers of images is time consuming and labor intensive, presenting a bottleneck for sample analysis. In this paper we look at how deep learning methods like object detection and image classification can assist in streamlining the process. To instantly assess image quality on data collected from trinucleotide repeat expansion disease samples, a fully convolutional network (FCN) was compared against Laplacian of Gaussian and fast Fourier transform methods. The FCN performed the best, reproducing human categorizations with an accuracy of 96% and an AUC of 0.990. Additionally, using the YOLOv8 architecture, we have developed an object detection model capable of detecting marked DNA from patients with Fragile X syndrome with an average precision of 0.966. The object detection model searched through 20 000 images containing DNA molecules and identified 248 marked molecules, of which 33 were real targets, greatly reducing the time taken to find target molecules for diagnostics. The integration of machine learning techniques in HSAFM systems shows promise to enhance the data collection and analysis process for genomics-based disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.