ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2025
Integrating genetic polymorphisms and clinical data to develop predictive models for skin toxicity in breast cancer radiation therapy.
Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aim to develop and validate predictive models for acute and late skin toxicity in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT). Models incorporate a genetic profile-comprising candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in non-coding RNAs and previously reported toxicity-associated variants-combined with clinical variables.
methodsThe study involved 1979 BC patients monitored for two to eight years post-RT in a multi-centre study. We assessed acute (oedema/erythema) and late (atrophy/fibrosis) toxicity using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. The cohort was divided into training and validation datasets.
resultsSix SNPs demonstrated to be predictors of acute (rs13116075, rs12565978, rs72550778 and rs7284767) and late toxicity (rs16837908 and rs61764370) either in the training or validation cohort. However, none of these SNPs were consistently associated with toxicity across both stages of analysis. The rs13116075, rs12565978 and rs16837908 were previously reported to be associated with RT toxicity. In the validation phase, SNP-based models showed limited predictive ability, with AUC values of 0.49 and c-index of 0.54 for acute and late toxicity, respectively. Models incorporating either clinical variables alone or in combination with SNPs achieved similar AUC and c-index values of ∼0.60 for acute and late toxicity, respectively. However, the combined model exhibited the highest predictive accuracy for acute and late toxicity, both in the training and the validation cohorts.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the importance of combining clinical data with genetic markers to enhance the accuracy of models predicting RT toxicity in BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.